The current demi-parure parure - the necklace and the brooches |
One of the most beautiful gifts came from the Nizam of Hyderabad. The Nizam was the owner of one of the most celebrated and largest private jewellery collections in the world, and his gift was suitably impressive – a demi-parure of a tiara and necklace.
Necklace
The necklace was purchased from Cartier. Actually, in a way it was acquired by Elizabeth herself: the Nizam wasn't in London at the time and left Cartier instructions that the Princess will personally choose her present.
The necklace was purchased from Cartier. Actually, in a way it was acquired by Elizabeth herself: the Nizam wasn't in London at the time and left Cartier instructions that the Princess will personally choose her present.
Nizam of Hyderabad was created by Cartier in 1930s. It consists of a long chain of 38 diamonds (reduced from the original 46) with a diamond-encrusted snap. The centre of the necklace is pave-set with detachable double-drop pendant 13 emerald-cut diamonds and a pear-shaped drop.
Nizam of Hyderabad Necklace |
The Countess of Greville (left) and Queen Elizabeth (middle and right) wearing the Nizam of Hyderabad necklace |
The Queen has worn Nizam of Hyderabad necklace through her life, although more often in her youth. This is also one of her favourite necklaces to don when she is posing for portraits. There is also a photograph of Elfrida Greville, Countess of Warwick wearing the necklace in 1930s. A side note: Elfrida the wife of Leopold Greville, 6th Earl of Warwick of the famous Greville family and the son of Daisy Greville – one of Edward VII’s most notable mistresses.
Tiara
The Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara wasn't a set with the necklace although it was in the same general style. It was also personally chosen by the Queen from the Cartier stock, as per the Nizam’s instructions.
Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara which was later dismantled to create the Burmese Ruby Tiara |
The tiara consisted of one large and two smaller roses surrounded by leaves, all diamond-encrusted. The roses were detachable and could be worn as brooches. The Queen wore this tiara from time to time until 1973, the last time it was seen.
The Queen wearing the Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara |
After years of speculation, it was finally confirmed in Hugh Roberts’s “The Queen’s Diamonds” that the tiara was broken up to create the Burmese Ruby Tiara.
I don’t hate the Burmese Ruby Tiara as some people do but honestly, dismantling this beautiful piece for that? How could you, Your Majesty? I am pretty sure there were enough loose diamonds in the royal collection to create a brand new tiara to incorporate all the Burmese rubies.
The Brooches
The three brooches that now remain from the Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara were originally detachable parts of the tiara.
The Nizam of Hyderabad Brooches which were originally part of the tiara |
The larger brooch has a diameter of 4.2 cm, while the smaller ones are 3.3 each. All three are in the form of roses pave-set with diamonds.
The Queen wearing the two smaller brooches together (left) and the larger brooch on its own (middle and right) |
These aren't and have never been among the Queen’s favourite brooches but she has worn them steadily through her reign. She usually wears the larger brooch on its own, or the two smaller brooches together.
Photo and information sources: National Portrait Gallery, Royal Collection, “The Queen’s Diamonds” by Hugh Roberts, Cartier Archives
Loved learning about these pieces. Can't believe she dismantled that tiara to make the burmese one.
ReplyDeleteYou and me both! The Burmese Tiara isn't too bad (what with symbolism and everything) but that's no excuse what dismantling a tiara, especially one as beautiful as this one.
DeleteI personally just do not understand the love for the Nizam tiara. For me, it's totally unremarkable, really rather mediocre and lacking in any wow-factor whatsoever. It's not ugly, but nor is particularly special in my view.
ReplyDeleteI like the Burmese ruby tiara with its lovely design of red roses (one of the most important symbols in Britain), with a real almost 3D effect. I certainly don't have any problem with the Queen's decision to dismantle the thoroughly average Nizam for it.
I love the symbolism behind the Burmese Tiara (the Tudor Rose aspect, and the significance of the 96 rubies), but there is something about the design that doesn't go well with me. Perhaps if the Tiara is worn by someone with darker heir, I'll like it better.
DeleteOne of the reasons personally I love the Nizam of Hyderabad Tiara is exactly because it is not a wow piece. There are more than enough substantial pieces in the British jewellery collection but very few delicate ones. I always thought the Nizam Tiara was perfect for a young Princess.